Wellbeing Innovation Centre

The conditions of wellbeing and shared life

Places and everyday practices shape how people experience their lives. This centre studies cultural participation, contact with nature, shared activity, and the rhythms of daily life.

The Abbey offers a setting in which these relationships can be explored through carefully designed studies. The aim is to understand who participates, what people experience, which changes can be measured, and whether useful approaches can be sustained and adapted elsewhere.

This programme concerns research into non-clinical environments and activities. Any study involving clinical care is developed with the responsible healthcare and research partners.

Research strands

Four strands, and what each one sets out to do

Four lines of enquiry, each with the goals it pursues and the studies it is designing.

A page from a large illuminated choirbook, with music and text written big enough to be read at a distance.
Ranworth Antiphoner, folio 22r, English, 15th–16th century. A choirbook is scaled so that a whole community reads from one page at once — its physical design is the difference between taking part and attending.

Culture and participation

Experiences of making, singing, learning and interpretation, including the difference between taking part and attending. The questions concern belonging, agency and continued engagement. We do not assume that every cultural activity produces a benefit, and establishing when it does not is as useful as establishing when it does.

We are interested in how cultural activities can be made accessible, acceptable and sustainable in everyday settings. This requires attention to participation, practical delivery and the circumstances in which an approach may be useful.

Studies will examine the experience of making, singing, learning and interpretation, alongside barriers to participation and the resources needed to sustain an activity. Measures and comparisons are selected with research partners for the specific question.

An illuminated page showing the hay harvest: several figures cutting and gathering in a field, with buildings behind.
The hay harvest, from the Rustican of Pietro de’ Crescenzi, Ms-5064 f. 198v, c. 1470–75. Bibliothèque de l’Arsenal. From an agricultural treatise rather than a pastoral fantasy: seasonal work as organised activity several people share.

Nature and meaningful activity

Gardening, seasonal work and the experience of landscape are forms of participation as well as forms of contact with nature. We want to study what participants themselves value, what prevents access, and how activity, setting and social contact relate to one another.

One distinction governs this strand. Research in this area divides into everyday access to green space, active nature-based health promotion, and therapy delivered to individual patients. This estate works in the first two and does not enter the third. Where a study requires a clinical intervention, a licensed partner holds it.

The goals here are to establish what participants themselves value in gardening, seasonal work and the experience of landscape; to identify what actually prevents access to nature-positive environments, rather than what is assumed to; and to separate the contributions of activity, setting and social contact, which are routinely confounded in work of this kind. This is social-science territory, and we keep it there.

The ninth-century Plan of Saint Gall: a large measured drawing of a monastery with every building named, including church, refectory, kitchen, cellar, dormitory and gardens.
The Plan of Saint Gall, Codex Sangallensis 1092, c. 820–830. Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen. Refectory, kitchen, cellar, dormitory and gardens all named and placed: a day designed rather than merely lived.

Daily rhythms and shared meals

A structured day, a common table, protected rest and opportunities for quiet are the ordinary materials of a residential setting. Their acceptability and their experience can be studied.

One methodological care matters here: the effect of a residential stay is not the same as the effect of a particular activity within it, and a study has to be designed to tell them apart. Food’s origin, quality and cultural meaning are researchable dimensions, not evidence of therapeutic superiority.

Our aims here are to study a food setting as a social meeting place that carries meaning for the people who use it, not merely as a room where eating happens; to test whether linking a kitchen to nearby producers changes what people eat and how they eat together; and to design studies capable of telling the effect of a residential stay apart from the effect of any single activity within it.

A bird's-eye engraving of the Amsterdam begijnhof: individual small houses each with their own door, arranged around a shared courtyard and church.
The Amsterdam begijnhof as it stood in 1544, engraved 1729. Rijksmuseum, RP-P-2019-339 (CC0). Individual houses with their own doors around a shared court: autonomy and mutual support in one plan.

Inclusive and intergenerational living

Questions of autonomy, mutual support, housing use and social participation, developed jointly with the Bauhaus Vision Implementation Centre.

A béguinage — modest independent dwellings around a shared court and a shared social life — belongs here as a research and development concept. It is not available housing and not a care service. The estate would be the community-living setting; where personal support is involved, a licensed operator provides it.

The goals of this strand are to study autonomy, mutual support, housing use and social participation in a shared-living setting; to examine what the shift away from institutional care toward living in the community actually demands of a place before it can receive anyone; and to develop the béguinage as a research and development concept, bringing cultural heritage, local food and contact with nature to bear on ageing, place and home.

Questions we want to answer

  1. Which features of a shared activity are associated with meaningful participation and belonging?
  2. How do the design and rhythm of a residential setting affect participants’ experience?
  3. Which practical conditions help a cultural activity remain accessible and useful over time?
  4. How can the effect of a residential stay be told apart from the effect of the particular activities within it?
  5. Who is excluded by cost, mobility, time, language, or assumptions about religious participation?
  6. Which approaches remain useful after participants return to everyday life?

Research priorities in this setting

These priorities build on existing research. The contribution of the Abbey is a defined setting in which experience, participation and practical delivery can be studied together.

  • Setting and participation. How do the character of a place, its activities and its access arrangements affect who takes part and what they experience? If referral pathways such as social prescribing are studied, they will be developed with the responsible partners.
  • Shared meals and daily rhythms. How do eating together, the organisation of a day and opportunities for quiet relate to belonging and participants’ experience? Studies will draw on research into commensality and distinguish a stay’s overall effects from those of a particular activity.
  • Inclusive and intergenerational living. Which arrangements support autonomy, mutual support and social participation? Models such as béguinage-inspired housing can inform comparative questions; a study must establish the relevance of each model and involve the people who would use it.

Methods and useful outputs

This programme begins with feasibility, acceptability, access and implementation studies. Validated measures are selected with qualified researchers, alongside interviews, activity records and appropriate follow-up.

Any claim of causal effectiveness requires an appropriate comparison and sample planned in advance. Fifteen private rooms describe hosting capacity, not a study sample. Feasibility work can examine recruitment, participation, measurement and delivery before a larger study is considered.

Specialist studies are developed with the relevant scientific leadership, ethical approvals and formal arrangements in place before recruitment begins.

What we are developing

Three studies are being designed, each of which we are seeking a research partner to lead:

  • A feasibility and acceptability study of a residential programme format — what participants can sustain, what they value, and what the setting has to provide for it to work.
  • An access and participation review: who comes, who does not, and what the barriers actually are. Cost, distance, language and assumptions about religious participation are all in scope.
  • A design concept for inclusive intergenerational living on the estate, developed jointly with the Bauhaus Vision Implementation Centre.

If one of these is close to your own work, this is the point at which a collaborator has most influence over how the study is framed.

Discuss a wellbeing research study

We are interested in hearing from research teams in public health, social science, cultural participation and gerontology, and from public bodies working on access, ageing and rural services.

Discuss a collaboration